Reliving Sandy Hook

Close to the anniversary of the slaughter at Sandy Hook, the court determined that Newtown Police Department must release the 9-1-1 tapes to the Associated Press. Several reasons beside the law have been argued including the American public’s right to...


Almost one year to the day of the horrific massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary in Newtown (CT), the seven 9-1-1 tapes related to the murder of 20 innocent first graders and eight heroic educators have been released. On December 14, 2012, while the public watched in horror, family and friends wailed in each others’ arms and police officers, fire fighters and emergency medical professionals attempted to sort through the chaos and the pain, the Associated Press was already making its request for the tapes from Newtown Police Department. The department met the request with silence for over a month. The AP pressed on and received the same response. On January 23, 2013, they appealed to the state Freedom of Information Commission. As a former 9-1-1 operator/dispatcher, I had to choke back the indignation that I felt over the whole process and the reasoning behind the “need” to put these tragic calls out into the public sphere. 

Freedom of Information Act

The Freedom of Information Act home page hosted by the United States Department of Justice states, “The Freedom of Information Act (FOI) is a law that gives you the right to access information from the federal government. It is often described as the law that keeps citizens in the know about their government.” In 2012, 651,254 requests were made to the FOI Commission many of which were provoked by silence or denial by the agency that held the information. It’s fair to say that most requests made are responded to with the information being provided. 9-1-1 tapes are considered public records, so they are not exempt from FOI and the release of which has often been a subject of heated debate. 

Privacy vs. Public Information

The main issue of the debate is where does public interest end and privacy begin? For example, is one citizen’s (random person) right to have the information supersede another person’s (grieving parent or 9-1-1 caller) right to not have their “story” aired on the nightly news and all over the internet? To me, a 9-1-1 call for help is very personal. Like the case in many unthinkable tragedies, the caller is in a vulnerable state reaching out in the only possible way begging for help. The 9-1-1 operator embodies the element of humanity. You call. We help. Unfortunately, as Connecticut State’s Attorney Stephen Sedensky and the Newtown Police Department learned, the public trumps one person. Some states have statutes that allow the release of transcripts but not the actual tapes if there are privacy concerns. Connecticut does not have any “extended privacy protections” and makes public records available on-line. So after a year long court battle where Sedensky tried to exempt the Sandy Hook 9-1-1 tapes from FOI citing the recordings contained “information relative to child abuse” and the “chilling effect” that revealing the names of witnesses would create, the appeals court said no. On Wednesday, December 4, 2013 with 10 days until the anniversary, the tapes became available to the public. Along with the law, there seems to be three trains of thought in reference to justifying the release of the tapes: the American public’s right to know, public healing and the American public’s right to judge the police response.

Information Belongs to the People

Transparency seems to be the central focus behind the law requiring 9-1-1 tapes be released. Cristina Hassinger, daughter of Sandy Hook Principal Dawn Hochsprung, expressed her feelings about the appropriateness of the release. She told CNN that knowing is better than not knowing and that the calls belong to the American public. I just can’t agree. I have a hard time understanding how 9-1-1 calls are information. What information could the public get from the calls? The media already shared what happened and all the information they gathered at the scene and from the reports which are also public record. What other information the families choose to share is their prerogative. I suppose if the 9-1-1 caller and the 9-1-1operator both felt their call should be shared, so be it. Other than that, the only reason I feel the public wants to know is for our increasing slide into a voyeuristic, reality show infused society. Shouldn’t 9-1-1 calls be a “need to know” situation like so much else in emergency services?

This content continues onto the next page...
  • Enhance your experience.

    Thank you for your regular readership of and visits to Officer.com. To continue viewing content on this site, please take a few moments to fill out the form below and register on this website.

    Registration is required to help ensure your access to featured content, and to maintain control of access to content that may be sensitive in nature to law enforcement.