Confessions of a training instructor

We have all been in class with “That Guy.” Admit it: odds are you have likely been “That Guy” at some point in your career. There are as many types of “That Guy” as there are people: the guy who shows up to class without the right equipment...


‘New Hotness’

Another, yet polar, version of ignorance is the “New Hotness” guy. These types of instructors grab onto and preaches from the mountain any new piece of equipment, tactic or technique that comes along. They switch up their program so often they have no consistency. Their troops cannot master a technique because how they are expected to perform a task is switched up constantly. This guy holds little to no value on the basics, and a lack of subject depth is a form of ignorance. His program, not his words, will reflect this.

The problem with new ways of doing business is vetting. I know I sound like I am contradicting myself. In one breath I am saying to stay current and in the next I am saying be careful of something new. My point is to not jump onto bandwagons and bring something into your program before vetting it. Anything new should build upon your existing program and should be closely examined and experimented with prior to bringing it in. Discuss it in detail with your peers and with the experts you know, and only when you know it is viable, allow it in.

Ego maniac

The last “That Guy” I want to discuss is the Ego. I was shooting with a range master many years ago who would only teach his troops just enough to be good, but never good enough to beat him. He was a very competitive individual and this created some issues. Being the example and setting the bar often drives credibility in an A-type personality environment. The problem is when our ego and self identity become so fragile that we cannot accept getting beaten at our own game. When you take on the role of an instructor you have to set aside that aspect of your ego. Your goal must be to make every student better than you. You must give them everything you have. Their success is your success and you must derive your pride and satisfaction from them.

Think of an NFL coach. His function is not to play the game on the field but his actions often determine the outcome. You may be a great shooter — and you should work hard to be the best you can — but once you put on the hat of an instructor your students’ abilities and needs should overshadow yours.

I know one range master who is so fearful of not being the best in his department he games his qualifications. He works for an agency that is 100-percent plain clothes, everyone is a detective. He makes his troops draw from concealment and complete courses of fire under time limits. But when he steps up to the line he tucks his shirt into his pants behind his gun. Surprise! He always has lower times than everyone else. He has been doing this for so long it’s become the topic of conversation with many of us in the surrounding law enforcement community. His reputation with his own troops is diminished as well as within his industry. Maybe he feels that ill-earned bragging rights make it worthwhile, but it’s not in my mind.

Constantly evaluate

Focusing on the basics is not the issue, as the basics of any activity must be sold and our training programs must be grounded in them. The point is that we cannot become outdated and ignorant to better, more efficient and tactically sound ways of getting the job done. To do so only hurts our troops and serves to lessen our credibility with them. This can spiral into a lack of confidence by the individual officer in their shooting abilities, and that can get them killed. We must read contemporary thought on the subject, attend not only instructor but also operator level courses, and constantly evaluate ourselves and our program.

One of the areas I push very hard is that every law enforcement range master should be a factory trained armorer in every weapon system issued by the agency. My understanding of how the firearm operates from an armorer prospective allowed me to understand in a more intimate way how the human body and the tool worked together. I was able to diagnose equipment issues on the range and effect repairs and maintenance before they deteriorated into something worse. Some students are visual, and by explaining how the various parts interact with each other made the process of shooting easier for them to understand.

  • Enhance your experience.

    Thank you for your regular readership of and visits to Officer.com. To continue viewing content on this site, please take a few moments to fill out the form below and register on this website.

    Registration is required to help ensure your access to featured content, and to maintain control of access to content that may be sensitive in nature to law enforcement.