A Cygnus Business Media Website            






Sponsored By:








My Clock's Ticking

Making a move before time runs out


Posted: Monday, August 4, 2008
Updated: August 3rd, 2008 07:42 PM EDT

Most Read Stories TodayMost Read Most E-mailed Stories TodayMost E-mailed E-mail This StoryE-mail Article Print This StoryPrint Article

ticking clock

John Wills

Just because you think your clock is ticking doesn't mean you should rush into decisions.
JOHN WILLS
Training Contributor


You hear women discussing it all the time - my biological clock's ticking, I need to get pregnant before I get too old. While the odds vary from woman to woman, the likelihood of conceiving and delivering a healthy child declines appreciably after 35 and more so after 40. There is a sense of urgency to "get it done" before it's too late, or risk facing a lifelong reality of thinking, "what if." What if I had a child...

Similarly, many of us face a time clock when it comes to the proposition of going from a local police department to a federal agency such as the FBI, DEA, ATF, or CBP, to name just a few. Since the federal system requires that anyone expecting to receive a pension work twenty years minimum to be eligible to collect one, it means the maximum age that one must have attained is no older than thirty seven.

That poses a huge dilemma for some of us, because it's not until we've been on the job for a number of years that our thoughts begin to wander in the direction of long range goals and plans. When we're young and brand new on the job, the only thing that we can think of is our next shift on the street. Indeed, if many of you are like me, I hated for my shift to end. I wished that I could stay out on patrol until I got tired enough to call it a day. Even if I was working midnights, made an arrest, and had to go to court that morning with the thug, I still hated when it was over. I never imagined that there was anything better out there, either in the type of work or the pay that I received.

Fast forward ten years into the job, and my thoughts began to center around what I might be doing in the next ten or twenty years. Would still I be pushing a squad car as a beat officer or sergeant, still rotating around the clock, having days off cancelled, working special events on weekends? The job had lost some of its luster, and I found that I wasn't as locked into it as much as I once was. So, like the case of the ladies' biological clocks ticking, the federal clock was ticking for me. I did not want to wonder years down the road "what if." I began to weigh my options and discovered that the federal arena had plenty of things going for it that looked attractive to me.

As with anything else, one needs to weigh the pros and cons when contemplating a major change such as one involving your career. A balance sheet is not only prudent in the financial arena, but also when exploring the possibility of moving on to a different employer. So let's take a quick look at what one might possibly gain, versus the likelihood of being in worse straits than before.

The Pros

  • Being "Nation wide" versus being confined to a beat or sector
  • Enhanced resources for investigations, i.e., money, equipment, manpower, and technical support
  • Better salary and benefits
  • A pension plan that never goes away (hint: it's the same plan that Congress has)
  • Moving around the country
  • The opportunity to work anywhere around the world
  • Top-notch training
  • Challenging long-term investigations

The Cons

  • Moving around the country
  • Becoming just a number, especially in large offices
  • More guidelines and federal rules to follow
  • Expectations from bosses and prosecutors that are sometimes unrealistic
  • Extended travel and TDY assignments
  • Layers of bureaucracy that impedes progress
  • TDY in foreign countries that end with the letters "STAN"

Generally speaking you will find that there are more items on plus side of the balance sheet. And, as with any job, there will be things and people that you won't be particularly fond of. But given the freedom that a federal agency affords someone, especially one who may be working for a small department and is frustrated at either the pay or lack of advancement, joining the feds looks like a good option.

From my own perspective, the 21 years that I spent with the FBI was an experience that I'd never be able to duplicate. I worked in several field offices around the country, and was TDY in plenty of others. I spent almost three years working undercover, with so much independence that I sometimes felt guilty even accepting my paycheck (I did take it each payday). My training was some of the best available anywhere in the world. I worked on some of the biggest cases in the Bureau, and spent a couple of years teaching street survival internationally.

Could I have done all of the above with the police department I was with? Certainly not. But don't everyone rush right out and throw in your application with every three letter agency in the country. Examine where you are in your career, and just as importantly, in your family life. There's a lot to be said for staying where you're at, not disrupting your family every few years, and not having to learn your way around a new city and establish your "cred" with a new group of people. At most offices where I worked around the country, I relied heavily on the local PD to tell me who the bank robbers and other thugs were. They knew their town inside and out. And, while the pay will eventually exceed what you are making now, you will probably take a pay cut to start.

That old saying, "The grass is always greener on the other side," means caution - take a hard look. If you make the jump to a federal job without doing your due diligence, you may make a huge mistake. So do your research, talk to folks already working in that agency, and most of all have a fall back plan should you decide that you made the wrong decision.

Is your clock ticking? If so you may want to hit the snooze button. Stay safe brothers and sisters!




Web Links:

John Wills an ILEETA member, spent 2 years in the U.S. Army before serving 12 years with the Chicago Police Department (CPD). He left the CPD to become an FBI Special Agent, working organized crime, violent crime, and drugs. John served as the Principal Firearms Instructor, Training Coordinator, and sniper team leader in the Detroit Division for 10 years. Before retiring from the FBI, he spent 7 years teaching at the FBI Academy at Quantico, VA. He has taught Street Survival domestically and internationally. John is presently a field manager with Advanced Interactive Systems. He also owns his own business - LivSafe. He is an authorized NCAA speaker on the danger of steroids, and he maintains a blog, Red State Papa. John serves as a judge for Law Enforcement Technology magazine's Innovations Awards, helping to evaluate new products. He can be reached at john@officer.com or (540) 226-9478.

» More Stories From Police Life



Share your thoughts, advice, opinions, and expertise @ Officer.com

     
Comments

Posted by RG
(08/06/08 - 03:12 PM)
John, I enjoy your articles, but I have noticed this trend. That local cops must, or should transfer to Federal agencies. As a local, I see the situation a little different. I am completely vested in my community. (Especially if you live in the area you patrol) That presents some very significant dangers, but the rewards of seeing the difference that I can make first hand exceed those negatives.

My situation may be unique, I am peace office in California. My retirement is the Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) 3@50 in California. My pay is comfortable for my area in California, which has some of the most wealthy areas in the United States. I received some very good training in my academy and thru-out my career.

I have had to explain to friends, family and citizens this philosophy:

What type of Law Enforcement do you want to do?

Fed vs local is pretty pointless. Having experienced both, you should understand this. Locals take calls for service, drive in circles for 10 hours at a time looking for the same problems day after day. Largely, Feds do not. You guys construct extremely complex and in-depth investigations into issues that effect the United States. Sometimes your investigations run into our daily operations, sometimes our daily operations run into some of your pretty sensitive investigations.

On the whole, we do different jobs. The public have very distinct images of what "cops" and "feds" and that the "uniform" and the "suit" are forever burned into the American Psyche. So far I have enjoyed my experience with Federal Law Enforcement. I have many friends who have either retired or are active in the various agencies the United States. I have also heard of some very dangerous horror stories, about Uniformed Officers confronting plain clothes Federal Agents...thankfully the situations were resolved without violence, but those stories could have easily gone the other way.

Certainly leaving a small town or large city department that pays considerably low is common and going to a National agency, whose jurisdiction starts with U.S., where as before your authority was only in MayBerry is beneficial.

It is true that for most of America, the Feds offer a better package than the local agencies. But at the end of the day, it boils down to what kind of law enforcement do you want to do. Do you want to be seen everyday driving a "black and white" or do you want to wear a "blue jacket with three gold letters on it"



Posted by DM
(08/06/08 - 11:57 PM)
You think that working in the "stan" countries is a con? Those of us who are over here know it's kinda hard to go after extremists from an office in the states.



Posted by JP in DC
(08/08/08 - 04:48 PM)
John,

I enjoy reading your articles and we have worked for the same master, however I just wanted to make a quick comment. I work for a federal agency and I am in a unique position. I am a uniformed police officer for my agency and I believe that there are those of us who enjoy being in uniform and interacting with the public on a daily basis and being on patrol.

I initially wanted to be an "agent" however after being in uniform and working around DC I enjoy what I do and at this time I have no plans to apply for an "agent" position.

I think that communities in this country need dedicated hard working officers that won't "jump ship" just to get to an "agent" job that they might not enjoy. I am 27 years old an I know that I am looking forward to leaving my federal agency to go back to a city or town where I can be part of the community and set a good example. Cops on the street can influence the country and do good just as much as feds can.

-RG I like your post, it makes sense.



Posted by Gunther
(08/10/08 - 01:19 PM)
My clock is ticketing
Go article; however, I must point out that if you are in a managmenrial position like captain up to police chief, it is easier to become a police chief in different parts of the country than it is being a street cop or detective after 20 or 30 years on the job.

Unless you have political connections, there is no way for an ordinary patrol or detective to become head of a federal law enforcement agency or head of a mid-size to very large city. Remember Mayor Rudoplh Guililia of New York City. He pluck out a street cop with a couple of years in and promote the guy a very very high ranking police officer. Now that guy is in trouble because he had connections with organized crime. Some of California Governor Swchanegger's Parole of Board Hearing member came from local police or sheriff departmetns. The media doesn't say what their rank was before they were appointed; however, I do know one former Parole Board member was the former Sheriff of Amador County. He must had some connections to get appointed.

You also would have to be indepedently wealthly if you want to run for the office of Sheriff if you couldn't get backing from the rich people in the county.



Posted by JP in DC
(08/12/08 - 07:24 PM)
Just one more quick comment: Do you think that too many people leave state and local PDs JUST for the retirmement package that Feds offer and nothing else? It seems to me that this shouldn't be the only reason to jump ship. But I guess $$ talks even in our profession.








Officer.com E-Mail Alerts
Sign Up for Free e-mail Alerts

Daily News & Features
Officer Down Alerts
Special Offers
Weekly Job Alerts