A Cygnus Business Media Website            






Sponsored By:








The Math of Survival

Is it as simple as 2+2?


Posted: Tuesday, February 23, 2010
Updated: February 23rd, 2010 08:18 AM GMT-05:00


ICP Logo

PETE ELIADIS
Mass Violence Incidents Contributor

Officer.com

We all know the basics: 2+2 =4, 4+4= 8, 8+8=16. Defining the output in a mathematical formula is easy, once you identify the variables. Stagnation + Complacency= Fatality. Pretty easy; right? I have had the opportunity to participate in or instruct numerous training courses. My experiences have shown that once officers receive training in a particular subject they place that training on the shelf and as time goes by forget about it. This is more prevalent with ranking officers who may not have the opportunity to apply the training that they received. For the ones who do apply their new training, often their mind set becomes very stagnant, since they have been trained and their performance very complacent, much like a mechanical function. Although this may suffice for administrative functions, operations require constant critical thinking analysis. Operations can become fluid, rapid and deadly for participants.

Active Shooter Training across the country is a standardized approach. Critical thinking skills may be overshadowed by repetition and the sense of urgency for reaction.

If an Active Shooter occurs, regardless of the type of premises, officers are trained to rush in and eliminate the threat. By all accounts, this is recognized as a best practice to save lives. However, critical thinking needs to be incorporated prior to operational deployment, if the threat is not imminent, in which the results rest on training and planning.

Tactics which require critical analysis cannot always be learned in standardized training. My experiences have shown that some of the most valuable training is by stimulating the mind with table top exercises. My experiences have shown that a Red Cell table top exercise stimulates critical thinking.

Red Cell exercises allow for half the class to strategize as the aggressor and the other half as the defender. The one constraint is that the defenders can only utilize actual resources available to them. For instance, if an Active School Shooter is the aggressor, the defenders cannot advise that they would be monitoring metal detectors if the school does not have them. If they don't have certain equipment, they cannot use it. However, the aggressor team is limited by their imagination. This challenges practical defending concepts and inspires revitalizing defensive approaches from the lessons learned portion of the exercise.

Attention to detail is the key to a successful exercise. Magnifying issues, such as, how many cartridges an officer has when entering a school (typically three magazines: one in the weapon and two on the duty belt) will cause participants to understand the importance of ammunition conservation. It will also cause the officer to drain his available resources in order to maximize survival. For instance, if an Active Shooter incident occurs and enough officers arrive to have a perimeter, the entry teams should acquire the perimeter officers' extra magazines. After all, the perimeter officers will have greater cover and mobility to protect them from a threat. These luxuries may not be afforded to the entry team; therefore, their need for abundant ammunition is critical. Meticulously highlighting each action during a table top exercise, rather than broad stroking it, is essential in revealing improvements and challenges.

Not only should officers' actions be scrutinized, but also the infrastructure of the building. Referring to an Active School Shooter, the past has demonstrated that these individuals are often armed not only with handguns but long guns as well. Active Shooters create improvised explosives to enhance their death count.

During a Red Cell table top exercise, it can become evident that soft targets exist inside a school. Chemistry rooms and Auto shop rooms provide several chemicals that can become very flammable and explosive. This ignition can be made by a small weapons round. The result would be devastating. Likewise, areas containing special needs children can become problematic to officials, not only for evacuation purposes, but if the Active Shooter targets this portion of the school.

Rectifying actions, which should be highlighted in the needs assessment, may be simply placing a self locking reinforced door in these areas. These are just a few lessons that can be learned from a proper Red Cell table top exercise. Using this information a true needs assessment can be created with enormous validity that will assist in providing community safety. Like all training exercises, Red Cell table tops need to be conducted on a bi-yearly basis, or more depending on criminal and enforcement trends.

Stagnation and Complacency will yield unfavorable results. Rather Critical Analysis + Proficiency= Survival. Critical Analysis of personnel actions within a scenario create the needs assessment and capitalize on the lessons learned to become Proficient. This basic formula will increase your chances of Survival.




Web Links:

Pete Eliadis is a 17-year law enforcement veteran with intense command experience, and is the founder of Intelligence Consulting Partners, LLC (ICP). He has earned a variety of national and regional instructor certificates, as well as academic degrees from international institutions, such as Johns Hopkins University. He has been a consultant in various combative and intelligence fields for many years. The purview of Pete EliadisÂ’ clientele spans federal, state and local governments, as well as the private sector. His company, ICP, prides itself on innovative training with emphasis on intertwining law enforcement and civilian applications. He is nationally published in the arena of the Active School Shooter.

» More Stories From Operations & Tactics



Share your thoughts, advice, opinions, and expertise @ Officer.com

     
Comments

Posted by MCP in Maryland
(02/24/10 - 10:22 AM)
Sum of the Value
Your theories are accurate and should be heeded by the herd. However, there are some additional equations that should precede the solution:

Why should we strip perimeter officers of their extra magazines/ammunition? Agencies should equip their officers with additional mags and ammo ... OR officers should equip themselves! For years, I've wondered where the premise of three magazines (or two speedloaders/dump pouches for old timers) was devised! Why only three? Certainly, some of negative mindset will retort "Well, why not only two then!"
We have heard "experts" claim that most police shootings occur within a short distance between cop and bad guy and that very few rounds are exchanged. On the flip side, many shootings involve a LARGE number of rounds within varying distances (anyone recall the high profile LAPD shootout with heavily armed bank robbers?).
Active shooter scenarios -- or any PROLONGED shootout -- requires surplus ammunition. Why limit ourselves to only three duty magazines? I personally carry five -- one in the gun, two on the belt, one on my active shooter vest and a fifth in my duty bag. Oh, and a box of extra ammo in the trunk.
Do we know WHEN the "big one" will happen? Of course not. Can we be prepared for when (if) it does? Of course.
Complacency and IGNORANCE kills more cops than criminal intent. Therefore, we have no excuse to be either.

A related note ... having a bunch of "cool" gear and throwing it in your trunk in no way makes an officer prepared for the "big one". In fact, it simply doesn't "make an officer" in any regard. Period.

Train, practice, and prepare yourself mentally and physically. Have the equipment to do the job and know it well.

Train as you work; work as you train. Be prepared, alert and stay alive.



Posted by Frank in SF, CA
(03/01/10 - 08:32 PM)
Pete, great article. Stagnation 100% breeds cockyness and the "know it all" fatal attitude. The Maryland contributor is right, that we LE, should be issued better and more equipment. But your point is very valid. We cant change administrator's getting equipment, but we can change our own attitude. Thank you for the article..








Officer.com E-Mail Alerts
Sign Up for Free e-mail Alerts

Daily News & Features
Officer Down Alerts
Special Offers
Weekly Job Alerts